Search for: "STATE OF KANSAS v. STATE OF MISSOURI" Results 101 - 120 of 574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2021, 5:29 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
”  The ruling could have repercussions for pregnancy exclusions in over 30 states, including 10 states with severe restrictions: Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Kansas, for example, is one of several states imposing a three-bracket income tax system. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:11 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Although not in the newsletter, many states are increasing funding for rural broadband, with and without CARES Act monies, including Kansas and Michigan. [read post]
For example, 13 states (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina and South Dakota) require authorization—often by voter signature—to collect and drop off ballots on behalf of the voter. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:34 am by Cassandra Maas
Businesses in Missouri and Kansas claimed that COVID-19 caused a “direct physical loss” to their businesses. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:51 am by Mark Wortman
The Missouri Court of Appeals considered an appeal of two contempt orders last year in Wuebbeling v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Esbeck, With the Supreme Court having Decided Espinoza v. [read post]