Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. S.D."
Results 101 - 120
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
LEXIS 99495 (S.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
No. 11-24110 (S.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc., 37 A.3d 549, 570 (New Jersey Super. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
H-05- 1250, 2007 WL 3145791, at *3 (S.D. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
The appellate court cites other decisions by the District of New Jersey which found standing under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act where plaintiff alleged “financial injuries based on their purchase of a product that did not have the attributes it claimed. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
State-law-based rulings in MDLs involve judges in one jurisdiction, like Judge Weinstein in New York in Zyprexa, deciding issues presented by other states’ laws – say whether a failure to warn was causal under Louisiana law. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
We found it interesting that in reaching its conclusion, the district court cited decisions by New Jersey courts whereas the Sixth Circuit opted for New York and California interpretations of New Jersey law. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:53 pm
District Courts in New Jersey has not yet weighed in on this subject, but it appears likely that they will follow the trend. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
The case discussing preemption is unreported and not binding on any other New Jersey court, SCS Healthcare Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
There’s nothing it can do about it, since it has no control over the competitor – short of closing its eyes to a potentially breakthrough new use for its product.DDLaw, More Thoughts On Conte v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
Nov. 18, 1986) in which a New Jersey state court judge ordered plaintiffs to offer proof connecting the defendant's product to the plaintiff's alleged injury. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
As we said in Monday's post (talking about New Jersey law), we think that sort of thing is preempted by Buckman. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am
Texas becomes the sixth state in which Bexis has participated in high court briefing that has resulted in adoption/reaffirmance of the learned intermediary rule (Pennsylvania, Coyle; New Jersey, Niemiera; Ohio, White; Kentucky, Larkin (for PLAC); and Connecticut, Vitanza (for PLAC)). [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:23 am
Litig., 2011 WL 5417173, at *3 (S.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
LEXIS 109255, at *19 (S.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
And with each day’s headlines new complications and permutations challenge any chance at a one size fits all understanding. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Cir. 2007) Eyewitness Testimony State of New Jersey v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Super. 2010) (“statistical probability does not substitute for actual inquiry, as a general showing of percentages does not tend to prove that the class members’ specific doctors relied upon Defendants’ statements or that Defendants’ statements were the proximate cause of an injury”); New Jersey Citizen Action v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
Yuan Li, a former research chemist for Sanofi-Aventis, plead guilty to stealing trad secrets in federal court in New Jersey. [read post]
