Search for: "STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS"
Results 101 - 120
of 777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780, 788-89 n.9 (1983); Illinois Board of Elections v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:00 am
United States Marshals Service, 2014 U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:01 am
He sued for his freedom, alleging that he had been brought by his master to a free state (Illinois) and a free territory (Wisconsin), where slavery was prohibited. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:32 am
The Stevenson court relied upon and cited to the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Mowry v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
Last month Michigan asked the Supreme Court to order Illinois to block the entry of Asian carp, a ravenous fish species, into Lake Michigan-a request that has since been joined by Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Ontario, and Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
Wisconsin Central Ltd., 2008 WL 1777222, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
But the challengers’ arguments are likely to be recycled after November 3 as state courts and boards of election issue rulings about ongoing vote-counting to align such counting with state constitutional principles.And in a potentially troubling sign this week, Justice Brett Kavanaugh (one of the four Justices who would have granted review in the Pennsylvania postmark dispute), in a separate case involving a federal court evaluating a federal law challenge to… [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
For example, the Illinois Appellate Court held in Fifield v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
For example, the Illinois Appellate Court held in Fifield v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
Because Ivy Tech has stated that it does not plan to seek Supreme Court review (despite a Circuit split on the issue), employers subject to Title VII, particularly in Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana, should know about this opinion and consider how and whether it may apply to them. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:58 pm
Hardin, 2010 WL 2524155, the Illinois Supreme Court held that probable cause standard was met under the Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act (725 ILCS 207/1 et seq.) adopting a more relaxed standard employed by the state of Wisconsin in State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:12 pm
Gear v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 8:26 pm
Next, the court stated that although AFCO allegedly interfered with Diedrich’s employment contract, the acts constituting the interference were alleged to have taken place in Wisconsin and Tennessee, not Illinois. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:37 pm
Other states, like Wisconsin, also pay particular attention to clauses that select another state's law. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
