Search for: "STATE v BOARD OF CO COMMISSIONERS" Results 101 - 120 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Jani
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 16 July 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Gourlay) v Parole Board. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, heard 22 and 23 July 2014. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Designing Proposals with your Unique Investors In Mind Posted by Amy Freedman, Michael Fein, and Ian Robertson, Kingsdale Advisor, on Friday, November 8, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Diversity, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Shareholder voting A Guidebook to Boardroom Governance Issues Posted by Amy Simmerman and Katherine Henderson, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Friday, November 8,… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As you might expect, however, my remarks today will reflect my views as an individual Commissioner and not necessarily the views of the full Commission or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
Clyde & Co LLP & Anor v Winklehof, heard 24 – 25 March 2014. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
Therefore, we advise the Board of Governors that it should accord marital status to its employees who were lawfully married in Massachusetts under the ruling of that state's highest court in Goodridge v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 16th March, the Court will hand down judgment in Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8, on appeal from [2019] EWCA Civ 143. [read post]