Search for: "STATE v. FRYE"
Results 101 - 120
of 508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Prior to 1993, the determination of whether scientific evidence should be allowed followed the “Frye” method, so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Frye “The First Hard Case: ‘Zeran v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
After a brief discussion of the long-recognized rule of Frye v United States — in that expert testimony must be based on scientific principles or procedures and is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field — the court swiftly deconstructed Dr. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), and to no longer apply the standard in Frye v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:01 am
Previously, the state courts adhered to the less strenuous Frye standard. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 1:35 pm
In Savage v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
Porter v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:10 am
Supreme Court ruling in Daubert v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:10 am
We went from being a “Frye” state (based on the 1923 precedent in Frye v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
I truly enjoyed each of the presentations of my fellow panelists: Guy Rub, Brian Frye, Rothman, and Sharon Sandeen. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
See Donaldson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
See Donaldson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
See Donaldson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:18 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Brian v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:54 pm
In 1923, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia issued its opinion in Frye v. [read post]
