Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Besides the student loan case, take United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
For instance, in a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” Jefferson County v Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 447 (1999) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:31 am
In Texas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She was the United States Solicitor General when the challenges to the statute were being resolved by the lower courts. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
After all, even Justice Scalia (Justice Barrett's mentor) used to emphasize that textualists attend to context. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
"I have not joined Justice Thomas, Justice [Antonin] Scalia, Justice Gorsuch in saying we should get rid of the Dormant Commerce Clause," Justice Alito says. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Once again, preferences and politics, not law, were the coins of the realm at the United States Supreme Court.Despite the conservative justices' rhetorical embrace of public meaning originalism, the reality is that constitutional litigation almost always involves the balancing of important and conflicting values. 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
The United States Constitution protects unenumerated rights. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
Gore, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
