Search for: "Schiff v. Schiff" Results 101 - 120 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 8:14 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In terms of defining what is meant by a parody, we have the Court of Justice of the European Union’s definition in the case of Deckmyn v Vandersteen (C-201/13). [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am by Anushka Limaye
In other Supreme Court news, Peter Margulies assessed the oral arguments in Sessions v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
In more recent years, I was pleased to see Console Mattiacci add Lane Schiff to its roster of associates. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The stipulation of settlement recited, among other things, that the defendant reviewed and understood its terms, had an opportunity to consult with counsel and have the legal and practical effect of the stipulation fully explained to him, executed the stipulation voluntarily, without coercion or pressure of any kind, and believed the stipulation to be fair and reasonable (see Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, LLP v Wilson, 136 AD3d 1326, 1328; Schiff… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:36 am by Ezra Rosser
Emily Stewart, Susan Collins says she won’t support a Supreme Court nominee who’s hostile to Roe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Ed Stein
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “” A claim for legal malpractice is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the mistakes of counsel'” (Schiff v Sallah Law Firm, P.C., 128 AD3d 668, 669, quoting Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083; see Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]