Search for: "Seagate Technology" Results 101 - 120 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 8:54 am
The Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG ("Qimonda") and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, Seagate Technologies International (Singapore), and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively "Respondents"). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:58 pm by Barry Herman
By way of background, and as explained in our October 19, 2009 post, the Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, Seagate Technologies International (Singapore), and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Patent Docs
Technology Transfer Tactics and Strafford will be offering a webinar/ teleconference entitled "Patent Infringement Claims, Opinions of Counsel and Attorney-Client Privilege" on January 5, 2011 from 1:00 - 2:30 PM (EST). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:56 am by Sally Peat
 Will we see this used with drone technology in the future? [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
First, on August 20, 2007, In re Seagate Technology, LLC changed the standard of willful infringement from one akin to negligence to that of objective recklessness. 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
Newsweek has a fascinating article about a woman who makes her living as psychic to the corporations: When Seagate Technology, the $11 billion-a-year maker of hard drives for the Playstation 3 and Microsoft Xbox, went searching for a consultant to run one of its management workshops in the fall of 2006, it bypassed the usual list of Silicon Valley gurus. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 10:54 am
Plaintiff Trading Technologies (“TT”) argued that the case was exceptional. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:48 pm by Doug Isenberg
-based Seagate Technology has said it wants to buy Samsung Electronics Co’s loss-making hard disk drive unit for $1.4 billion — a deal that will give Seagate access to Samsung’s NAND-type flash chips for its solid-state drive products. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
Corporate Counsel has an interesting article about a $630 million award against it and in favor of competitor hard-drive maker Seagate Technology. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Reuters is reporting that Seagate Technology LLC has been awarded $525 million in an arbitration that it brought against Western Digital and a former Seagate employee who joined Western Digital. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by Alex Gasser
By way of background, on November 20, 2008, Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) filed a complaint with the ITC against LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) (collectively, “Respondents”) alleging violation of Section 337 by the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation of chips… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:28 am
  Of particular interest, the willfulness instruction, at page 35, is likely one of the first that used the new objective recklessness standard from In re Seagate. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:54 am by Sheppard Mullin
June 14, 2012), available at http://www.cafc. uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinionsorders/ 10-1510.pdf (“Bard”), the Federal Circuit made clear that the objective prong of the willfulness standard set forth in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:18 pm
HTC first argued that In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by James L. Higgins
(citing In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:38 am
It goes to the defendant's knowledge and state of mind, which Seagate holds irrelevant to the objective inquiry. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:56 am by James L. Higgins
Id. at 3-4 (discussing first prong of the Federal Circuit’s test for establishing willful infringement under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]