Search for: "Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Stefanie Levine
Another forum seeing an increase in use is the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reviews jury instructions for which a timely objection is lacking for fundamental error. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:41 am by Jani
Authorization of infringement was the subject of a heated legal battle in the Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd case (discussed more extensively on this very blog over a year ago) - the very example discussed in the paper as well. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am by Guest Barista
In another case, Philmac Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
(v) were 32Red's Community marks and United Kingdom trade marks valid;? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 am
406/10 SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd, which the Chancery Division, England and Wales, referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling in July 2010. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
The TDRA establishes that “[a] famous mark is one that ‘is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Naturally, Maersk disputed all that. [read post]