Search for: "See v. See" Results 101 - 120 of 121,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am by Nedim Malovic
We see that only 0.29% out of all EU trade marks registered in 2023 were non-traditional marks. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Not only was the delay minimal, but plaintiff received inpatient and rehabilitative treatment for more than two months following the accident, and therefore had a reasonable excuse for the delay (see Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Not only was the delay minimal, but plaintiff received inpatient and rehabilitative treatment for more than two months following the accident, and therefore had a reasonable excuse for the delay (see Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In connection with their investigation, the commissioners demanded to see the consultants’ reports and LifeLabs claimed they were privileged. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Friedman, P.C., 153 AD3d 1250, 1252 [2d Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Havell v Islam, 292 AD2d 210, 210 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
This week sees the launch of the party manifestos in the UK general election and it will be interesting to see what media and legal policies are promised by the parties. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
See, e.g., Charitable: Eliminating Prejudice and Discrimination. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
Querino v Cambridge City Council (Rev1) (2024) EWCA Civ 314 We’re a bit late to this one. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]