Search for: "Sharpe v. Light" Results 101 - 120 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
In MNB v News Group ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)) Sharp J considered an application by the defendant to make such an order. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:20 pm
I’m doing some research into the 1986 abortion case of Thornburgh v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:44 am by Larry Ribstein
The ruling signaled a sharp and exogenous increase in Delaware Courts’ scrutiny over board decisions. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Second, the rule assures concrete, sharp presentation of the issues and enables courts to avoid ruling on abstract grievances. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:08 pm by Altman & Altman
  The worst vehicle in the group was a new Honda model, the HR-V. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Although there is a general right to a public hearing (See Werner v Austria [1998] 26 EHRR310, and Scarth v UK [1998] 26 EHRR. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
" To which I might respond by noting that here's a difference between "framing the question in your favor," on the one hand, and "setting forth an alleged 'question presented' that's essentially tautological and doesn't shed light at all on what the case is actually about. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
They look a little different, but the Dutch Supreme Courtsays that they should be treated just the same  Yesterday afternoon, the AmeriKat's Dutch friend, Professor Tobias Cohen Jehoram (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek) sent her, hot of the press, a copy of the Dutch Supreme Court's decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Teva delivered yesterday morning. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:45 am by Jeff Welty
According to the CDC, a “sharp instrument” was used in over 1,300 homicides in 2019. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:23 am by Gregory Forman
Back in my office this morning, curiosity got me researching, and researching located the case: Sharpe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am by Giles Peaker
I strongly maintain those views, but they now have to be read in the light of the contents of para 78 above in a case where the equality duty is engaged. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am by Eszter Szakács
Eszter SzakácsCo-author: Zsolt Lengyel, Danubia Patent and Law Office Just a few months before the CJEU’s judgment in C-121/17 Teva UK Ltd and Others v Gilead Sciences Inc. came out a the Metropolitan Court of Budapest handed down a decision regarding Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp’s (MSD) application for an SPC re the combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. [read post]