Search for: "Sierra Club v. DOE" Results 101 - 120 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Migraines and Social Security Disability, Part 2
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm by Ted Smith
Aug. 28, 2013), citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
Indiana Social Security Disability Attorney Blog - http://www.indianasocialsecuritydisabilityattorney.com/
Of Pigs and Politics
18 Nov 2011, 11:00 am by Jeff Lorenzo
NPPC v. [read post]
Indiana Environmental Law - http://www.indianaenvironmentallaw.com/
Judge rejects FWS biological opinion on Florida development permit and impacts to wood storks, but finds Army Corps met conservation duties
8 Nov 2009, 7:05 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
ESA blawg - http://www.esablawg.com/esalaw/ESBlawg.nsf
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
D.C. Circuit Upends CEQ’s NEPA Rules
12 Nov 2024, 2:59 pm by Bridget C.E. Dooling
Sierra Club, which referred to the executive order origins of the CEQ regulations and did not bat an eye, instead finding that “CEQ’s interpretation of NEPA is entitled to substantial deference. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Federal Court's preliminary injunction opinion in grazing case leaves the reader wanting MUCH more...
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
" Sierra Club v. [read post]
ESA blawg - http://www.esablawg.com/esalaw/ESBlawg.nsf
Kentucky federal court rejects need for Forest Service to reinitiate consultation on Indiana Bats, notes absence of White Nose Syndrome
18 May 2009, 6:54 pm
" Sierra Club v. [read post]
ESA blawg - http://www.esablawg.com/esalaw/ESBlawg.nsf
2015 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
CREED-21 v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
CAFC in Nantkwest: “[a]ll expenses of the proceedings” under § 145 includes the pro-rata share of the attorneys’ fees the USPTO incurred to defend applicant’s appeal.
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680, 684 (1983); see also Baker Botts, 135 S. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Court Affirms CEQA Does Not Require Cumulative Impact Analysis Where Project Makes No Contribution to Groundwater Impacts
24 May 2011, 10:33 am
Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Linke v. Freed: Weighing In On Public Official’s Social Media Sites
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Inst. v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Fourth District Publishes Another CEQA Decision Setting Aside San Diego Lead Agency’s EIR For Failure To Analyze And Mitigate GHG Emissions Per 2005 Executive Order; SANDAG Announces It Will Seek Review Of Related Adverse Decision
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Biden’s Proposed Power Plant Rule is a Solid First Step
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am by Andria So
In fact, the EPA has proposed a review of NOx emission standards for gas plants in response to litigation by the Environmental Defense Fund and the Sierra Club. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
Delineating CEQA’s Scope: First District Holds CEQA Does Not Apply To Ministerial Approval Of Multifamily Housing Project Allowed By Right Under Zoning Where City’s Discretion Was Limited To Design Review
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
U.S. Supreme Court Hands ERISA Plan Participants Major Victory in Allowing Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees
25 May 2010, 4:44 pm by Robert J. McKennon
Sierra Club, 463 U. [read post]
California Insurance Litigation Blog - http://www.californiainsurancelitigation.com
Nationwide Environmental Case Law Update – Summer, Fall 2015
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
” Sierra Club v. [read post]
Gravel2Gavel Construction Law Blog - http://www.gravel2gavel.com/
Oral Argument Preview, Part II: Hawaii Supreme Court Considers Whether A Change In "Context," But Not The Project, Triggers A Supplemental EIS
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Keep the North Shore Country - Sierra Club, Hawaii Chapter The parties seeking to overturn the ICA's decision are Keep the North Shore Country and the Hawaii Chapter of the Sierra Club. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
First District Applies CEQA’s “Subsequent Review” Rules, Substantial Evidence Standard of Review; Upholds Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Master Use Permit for Remote Buddhist Retreat
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Court distinguished its decision in Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Discovery Rule Does Not Apply To Statute Of Limitations In A CEQA Action
1 Sep 2016, 10:54 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/