Search for: "Smith v. New Haven" Results 101 - 120 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by Chris Castle
 (By the way, support HR 1695 by signing the CreativeFuture petition if you haven’t already.) [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In addition, as law professors Robert Tuttle and Peter Smith explained last week in an essay for the Huffington Post, the McCreary case could also bear on the validity of a new EO. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 2:45 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-02-11 https://t.co/7lED1yoHpU -> Copyright subsists in standards AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS v. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
Unless a legislature decides to title a law the “Retroactive Punishment of Child Molesters Statute,” the Supreme Court of the United State has held in Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 CO: Jason Sloan, Kevin Amer, Regan Smith, Abi Mosheim Smith: 1201 is part of DMCA; Congress recognized that TPMs could be deployed not only to prevent piracy but also support new ways of dissemination of © material to users digitally. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
Dec. 30, 2014) (“sophisticated new techniques, including metadata filtering, predictive coding, and other forms of technology-assisted review, are immensely advantageous . [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
IP markets haven’t agreed, nor have lower courts until recently—attenuated or abolished by courts. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Cybereagle’s Graham Smith gives his reaction to the report here. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court cited SHAD Alliance v Smith Haven Mall, 66 NY2d 496, in which the Court of Appeal held that in order for a plaintiff to maintain such an action the plaintiff would have to allege facts that would show that the State [1] "is so entwined with the regulation of the private conduct as to constitute State activity"; [2] that "there is meaningful State participation in the activity"; or [3] that "there has been a delegation of what has… [read post]