Search for: "Speake v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 8,099
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Samuel Bray
" And as Justice Brennan described our system in his opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm by NARF
(Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
” As More described England, the United States also is “planted thick with laws, from coast to coast. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
So every time a relative sues to try to get damages for the death of a relative in the United States, those are all statutory. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
In relation to the transfer of Russian assets in particular, the United States has been reported as endorsing countermeasures adopted “by states ‘injured’ and ‘specially affected’ by [the Russian] aggression” against Ukraine. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm by Lexi Coghe
Bunnatine “Bunny” Greenhouse put her career on the line to stand up to corruption in the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am by John Coyle
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
Charter, which enshrines the “sovereign equality” of the United Nations’ members. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]