Search for: "Starkes v. Marks"
Results 101 - 120
of 331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:09 am
’” Id. at 1337 (quoting Stark v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 3:11 pm
Chavakula v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:33 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Mark Dwyer of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Paula-Rose Stark of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:21 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Mark J.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:43 am
New York Times v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:17 pm
The outcome was affirmance of Judge Stark of D. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
Sandoval v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:50 pm
As such, it was not surprising that Apple was an active litigant in those days, in stark contrast to the emerging software behemoth from the Pacific Northwest. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 4:59 am
Simon Offers Supreme Court Stark Choice by William S. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
Based in part on this assurance, the Supreme Court in February of this year dismissed the case, Clapper v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:46 pm
"Policy provisions must be interpreted according to common speech and consistent with the reasonable expectation of the average insured, and ambiguities are to be construed against the insurer" (Place, 190 AD3d at 1209 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Lobello v New York Cent. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
In Katz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The Court did not rule that Congress lacked the power to regulate marriage, but it did hold that DOMA was invalid because it marked a stark deviation from a long history and tradition of the federal government’s deferring to state-law determinations of marital status. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
Everything you ever need to know about the IJLIT here.In stark contrast to IJLIT's blinding white is the gleaming black of Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases law reports. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:09 pm
(This post was written before the council of the Association of Law Costs Draftsmen responded to the post Costs Counsel v Costs Lawyers (click link) and should be read in conjunction with that. [read post]
