Search for: "State v. York" Results 101 - 120 of 35,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
In the United States, the overturning of the precedent set in 1973 by the abortion decision of Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a New York State Supreme Court's ruling granting the City of New York's motion to [1] dismiss racial discrimination claims alleged by Plaintiffs pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws and [2] the hostile work environment claim Plaintiffs alleged pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law which the Plaintiffs had asserted against the City of New York and a named… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a New York State Supreme Court's ruling granting the City of New York's motion to [1] dismiss racial discrimination claims alleged by Plaintiffs pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws and [2] the hostile work environment claim Plaintiffs alleged pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law which the Plaintiffs had asserted against the City of New York and a named… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:38 am by Ellena Erskine
ShareThe justices will hear oral argument in Department of State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]