Search for: "State Court of Clayton County"
Results 101 - 120
of 640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
Clayton County, June 15, 2020, U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:13 am
Clayton County that extended non-discrimination protections to LGBT workers nationwide. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 4:07 am
Clayton County, Georgia</u>, where the court held that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 discrimination against a transgender person is unlawful. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Clayton County, treating discrimination against gay and trans persons as “discrimination . . . because of sex” for purposes of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a decision rendered by a 6-3 majority. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
The Court serially ruled that the petitioner stated sufficient grounds to dissolve Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am
Vaughn, 202 S.W.3d at 320; Clayton v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 7:00 pm
Clayton County, Georgia, which held that that Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination also extends to gay and transgender workers. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am
Clayton County, which held that the federal law prohibiting employers from discriminating “because of” a person’s sex protected homosexual and transgender employees. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Clayton County that “the ordinary public meaning of the statute’s language at the time of the law’s adoption” nonetheless carried that implication.In response to the Bostock ruling, Senator Hawley lamented that the modifications made to originalism and textualism to make them plausible also turned them into tools that no longer ensure ideologically conservative results, going so far as to call the Bostock case “the end of the conservative legal… [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Clayton County, Georgia that it was held Title VII protections against discrimination “on the basis of sex” included protections for LGBTQ employees – specifically recognizing the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender workers. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
Clayton County (decided on Jun. 15, 2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:29 am
Clayton County, 140 S. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
Neither the High Court nor the Court of Appeal agreed with that. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
Clayton County held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employment discrimination based on LGBT status? [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
That study was cited by Justice Alito's opinion for the Court, at note 2. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 2:00 am
Clayton County to Dobbs v. [read post]
