Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V T. A. D., Appellant" Results 101 - 120 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen looks ahead at Kingsley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Moving to slightly less rarified circles, the respondents in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  However, Conte was decided by but one of several California appellate courts, and we understand that they don’t have to follow each other’s decisions. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  We’ll see where this case goes, if anywhere.Sixth, also on the appellate front:  We’ve blogged several timesabout the fate of a supersized 8-figure verdict for a plaintiff who wasn’t even hurt all that much in Polett v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Supreme Court’s recent prior decisions in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
 When asked if he reviewed the identical [innovator drug] label before treating [plaintiff], [the prescriber] responded “not in detail, no. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit struck down the Obama EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule in EME Homer City Generation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 12-694 (third relist since the record arrived); the Ninth Circuit state-on-top habeas case Chappell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]