Search for: "State of Alabama v. B. T. D.; B. T. D. v. State of Alabama"
Results 101 - 120
of 244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
§310.200(b). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Supp.2d 1072, 1074 (D. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:37 am
In Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Alabama to give her the time to prepare an opinion respecting denial in the case. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
Alabama, which involved a challenge to an Alabama rule requiring the disclosure of the names of the NAACP’s supporters. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
In its petition, Alabama asks (1) whether the state courts were objectively unreasonable when they held that DeBruce failed to establish that his counsel performed deficiently at his trial’s penalty phase; and (2) whether the state courts were objectively unreasonable when they held that DeBruce had not been prejudiced by his counsel’s performance. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Even the new business this week isn’t all that new. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
I guess you’d have to say that that’s okay, right? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
Alabama, 10-9646, and Jackson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:21 am
§101.60(c)(2)(v)). [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
B. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Court: Alabama Supreme Court Docket: 1111554 Judge: Murdock The State Comptroller, Thomas L. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
