Search for: "State of Maine v. Davis" Results 101 - 120 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Bill Marler
He stated he took a full-strength aspirin tablet (325 mg) every day but was not on any other blood thinners. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
The lawsuit does not involve provisional ballots, signature matches or counting delays—logistical aspects of modern elections that are increasingly subject to legal dispute—but instead attacks the basic substantive rules that Maine law uses to determine who wins Congressional elections.The crux of the legal challenge is the permissibility of Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting system, which the state’s voters adopted via a citizen initiative in 2016 and… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The main function of these amendments is to entrench journalist’s rights to remuneration for the use of their content whilst safeguarding copyright ownership. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am by Andrew Hamm
Federal Election Commission, by Charles Davis, Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
For others, taxes are at most incidental to the main story, particularly given that Boston and New York City are not exactly known as oases of low taxation. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
 Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) have not signaled plans to oppose his confirmation despite strong lobbying over their votes. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 11 July 2018 Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8996, Davis v. [read post]