Search for: "State v. A.C." Results 101 - 120 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
Anderson, [1942] A.C. 206, arguably cast doubt on the practical significance of this common law principle. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:17 pm by Giles Peaker
Summers v Salford Corp (1943) A.C. 283 at 289 cited “I will only cite one passage from my own judgment in Morgan’s case, because I know no better way of expressing my present opinion after a lapse of fifteen years. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by Giles Peaker
On a duty of care, there was an assumption of responsibility and the principles in Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964) A.C. 465 applied. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
Lord Hoffman has in fact stated that the legislative reforms have served to “free the Courts from technical considerations of legal right and to confer a wide power (to do what is fair)…” – O’Neill v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Léveillé, [1933] S.C.R. 456 (S.C.C.), the Court considered the role circumstantial evidence plays in meeting the burden of proof and stated at para. 35: The general principle in accordance with which in cases like the present the sufficiency of the evidence is to be determined was stated by Lord Chancellor Loreburn in Richard Evans & Co., Limited v. [read post]