Search for: "State v. General Chemical Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Bruce Zagaris and Zarine Kharazian
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Bruce Zagaris and Zarine Kharazian
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
.: The Stimson Center will host an event on going global on chemical safety and security. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
Other chemicals can settle on the earth, seep into the groundwater, pollute inland rivers and streams and carry their toxic impact into freshwater bays and ultimately the ocean. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
  Second, original sources proved to be a better source for generating discussion and forcing analysis, than heavier reliance on secondary materials. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am by Michael Livermore
Another case in which Kavanaugh disagreed with like-minded colleagues in an environmental case was 2010’s Howmet Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
When California knows that a chemical or an exposure causes cancer, the state does not necessarily know that the chemical or exposure causes cancer in human beings; nor does it necessarily know that the chemical or exposure causes cancer at the exposure level experienced by the citizens of the state. [read post]