Search for: "State v. Greenberg"
Results 101 - 120
of 551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 4:29 am
, Inc., 174 A.D.3d 682, 102 N.Y.S.3d 687 [2 Dept., 2019], citing Greenberg v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 6:03 am
Paul Reinsurance Co., LTD. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
Times Co., 206 F.3d 161, 171 (2d Cir. 2000) (quoting Bourne v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:28 pm
” See Kosinski v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 12:11 am
Intellisphere, LLC, November 20, 2019, Greenberg, M.). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v Davis, 198 AD2d 63,… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:21 am
” written by Andy Greenberg and published by Wired on November 19, 2014. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 12:27 pm
That’s because an old case from the Ohio Supreme Court (State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The former New York mayor logged a decade with the law and lobbying firm then known as Bracewell & Giuliani and a two-year stint after that with Greenberg Traurig. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:16 am
”); Lockwood v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm
Greenberg v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well this concern in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
Dagenhart, United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Greenberg, Robert J. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:34 am
(Tenore v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
In Mahoney-Buntzman v Buntzman, 12 NY3d 415 [2009], New York State’s highest court wrote a seemingly hard-and-fast rule: “A party to litigation may not take a position contrary to a position taken in an income tax return. [read post]
