Search for: "State v. Liptak"
Results 101 - 120
of 989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
See also Adam Liptak, “Doctor’s Testimony Leads To a Complex Legal Fight,” N.Y. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am
State Bar of Wisconsin, a pending petition “involving attorneys objecting to being compelled to join the Wisconsin state bar and pay fees. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
In Barton v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
At The Washington Free Beacon, Kevin Daley reports that Monday’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:09 am
Here's the full text of the new case, Ramos v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp writes that although “[t]he Supreme Court took a step in the right direction [last] week when it held [in Comcast v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
” Mark Walsh reports for Education Week’s School Law Blog that “state courts of last resort have split on whether the sentencer—either a judge or jury, depending on the state—must find the defendant to be permanently incorrigible before imposing life without parole. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
” Bill Mears reports for Fox News that the case “is part of a larger effort by red states to pass laws regulating abortion to test how supportive the new justices will be of precedents like Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak and Abby Goodnough report that “[t]he case was brought by Republican state officials, who argued that when Congress eliminated the law’s requirement in 2017 that most Americans obtain health insurance, the law became unconstitutional[; t]he Trump administration sided with the state officials, arguing that the rest of the health care law could not survive without the requirement. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
” In a column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses Tanzin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
