Search for: "State v. McNeil" Results 101 - 120 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bayer Schering, 575 F.3d at 1347 (citing O’Farrell, 853 F.2d at 903); see also Ortho-McNeil, 520 F.3d at 1364 (stating the number of options must be “small or easily traversed”). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bayer Schering, 575 F.3d at 1347 (citing O’Farrell, 853 F.2d at 903); see also Ortho-McNeil, 520 F.3d at 1364 (stating the number of options must be “small or easily traversed”). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
The Court's more recent 1991 ruling in McNeil v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm by Eric Goldman
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:18 am by Kalvis Golde
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost suggests that this term’s decision in American Legion v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Max Kennerly
In the big picture, although class actions were intended to permit many disparate plaintiffs with similar claims to aggregate their claims against defendants, courts now, particularly after the Dukes v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
McNeil, No. 09-11051, to reconsider in light of Holland v. [read post]