Search for: "State v. New York State Public Employment Relations Bd."
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 8:52 am
New York State Employment Relations Bd., 2019 WL 4491669 (N.Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:47 am
From Does 1-6 v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Factual BackgroundPlaintiff is in her late thirties and an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Zarda brought a claim in the Eastern District of New York alleging sex stereotyping in violation of Title VII and sexual orientation discrimination in violation of the New York Human Rights Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
In response to certified questions, the New York Court of Appeals held that (a) proceeds of a fraud could constitute marital property, and (b) when part or all of the marital estate consisted of the proceeds of fraud, that fact did not, as a matter of law, preclude a determination that a spouse paid fair consideration according to the terms of New York's Debtor and Creditor Law section 272. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Election Bd. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
American AtheistsDocket: 10-1276Issue(s): (1) Which Establishment Clause test should be applied when analyzing passive public displays; (2) does the Establishment Clause forbid roadside memorial crosses marking the site of death for state highway troopers killed in the line of duty; and (3) is a collection of memorials owned by a private organization, disclaimed by the state, and located on both private and public property properly classified as government speech? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Box 5120 Augusta, ME 04332 Phone: (207) 622-5767; (800) 464-5767 (Toll Free in ME only) Web: http://me.nami.org State Mental Health Agency Department of Behavioral and Developmental Services 40 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 Phone: (207) 287-4223 TTY: (207) 287-2000 Web: http://www.state.me.us/bds State Mental Health Representative for Children and Youth Children's Services Department of Behavioral and Developmental Services 40 State… [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of New York framework to analyze his takings claim. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Board of Regents,[4] a case decided before New York law expressly prohibited fee-splitting. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 1:12 pm
See, e.g., Ison v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Under New York law, the no-action clause of a trust indenture barred noteholders' suit alleging that the corporation's issuance of a dividend and planned spin off a business were fraudulent transfers. [read post]