Search for: "State v. Nichol"
Results 101 - 120
of 613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:57 am
Philip Nichols, presiding, which denied Jason Gregory Mitchell’s motions to correct what he asserts are illegal sentences. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:59 am
Multiple appeals followed and the matter ultimately was resolved after the decision in Malmberg v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:06 am
Ct.): Nichols Brief Here is the motion to dismiss in a case involving a Creek reservation crime where the defendant marked “I” on the racial identity box, State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
By Joshua Ben David Nichols. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:04 pm
The court quoted Fields v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
CFIUS concluded that the acquisition “threatens to impair the national security of the United States” and recommended divestiture. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:44 am
In the related case of J.B.B.C. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Nichols said that “while the automobile has grown cleaner and more efficient, the other half of our transportation system has barely moved the needle on clean air. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
See Letter from Senators Kaine, King, and Coons to Rob Nichols (Apr. 9, 2020). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067, 1074 (Fla. 2006). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067, 1074 (Fla. 2006). [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:45 am
Nichols, 114 So. 431, 434 (Fla. 1927)). [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
Nichols 19-794Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
Section 9 – Action against persons not domiciled in the UK or an EU/Lugano Convention State Section 9 provides that the court will not have jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim where the prospective defendant is resident outside of the UK, European Union, or the Lugano Convention states (Norway, Switzerl [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
In line with the CJEU's decision in Nichols Trade Mark Application [2004] ETMR 48, and the UK Trade Marks Work Manual, the Registrar stated the principle that full names, as trade marks, are deemed inherently distinctive, provided they are not extremely common and the number of traders in the relevant trade is not large. [read post]