Search for: "State v. Packard" Results 101 - 120 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 9:11 am by Rantanen
To uphold such a claim . . . would be to disregard the principles governing reissued patents, stated upon great consideration by this court at the last term in the case of Miller v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
IBM’s 2010 patent total nearly quadrupled Hewlett-Packard’s and exceeded the combined issuances of Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, EMC, and Google. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:45 am by Susan Brenner
  On the Hewlett Packard laptop officers found sixty-four thumbnail size images of child porn or child erotica -- nine of them, which depicted young or preteen girls in various states of undress, . . . which could be viewed by the computer user on the screen, were shown to the jury. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:18 am
As a result, the Government had not proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the items seized and ultimately searched (the Dell Laptop, the Hewlett Packard Laptop and Centon thumb drive) were seized in accordance with the 4th Amendment.U.S. v. [read post]