Search for: "State v. Patrick C."
Results 101 - 120
of 630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
In support of this position, Hallsworth refers to Star Industrial Company Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor t/a New Star Industrial Company [1976] FSR 256, which stated that-- a purchaser of a mark becomes owner of it only if he becomes at the same time purchaser of the manufactory or the business concerned in the goods to which the mark has been affixed. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm
Chopak’s “Apology to Edward Patrick”, she only admitted to “mistakenly” stating a falsehood. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
Another group, trade associations, fall under section 501(c)(6). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Willett and James C. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am
’” The court says a Section 230(c)(2)(A) outlier case in federal district court, e-ventures v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
(The fit between the UK’s ‘worker’ status and EU labour law was discussed in B v Yodel Delivery Case C‑692/19, B v Yodel Delivery (CJEU, Judgment 22 April 2020).) [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
Bénin et Guillaume Soro et autres c. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Becerra, (Texas Review of Law & Politics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2020).Nancy C. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:48 am
192/18, Commission v Poland; C? [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:18 am
Federal preemption of state medical fee schedules and regulations are a prevailing challenge to the patchwork of non-uniform state benefit programs.EagleMed, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Commission applied Article 11 of the International Law Commission Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ILC Articles on State Responsibility) as ‘relevant rules of international law’ under Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties (VCLT). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
§ 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Lanham Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
(See Moore v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 11:27 am
” The matter at issue, State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 11:27 am
” The matter at issue, State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 11:27 am
” The matter at issue, State v. [read post]
