Search for: "State v. Piper"
Results 101 - 120
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:40 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
There was a comment on the DLA Piper “Privacy Matters” blog. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
DLA Piper has produced a summary and analysis of the decision. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘Allegations regarding an act of deceit . . . must be stated with particularity'” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
Gillig, 602 F.3d at 1363; In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 244 F.3d 1289, 1298 (11th Cir. 2001); Curtis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
In today’s case (Kam v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:09 am
[3] Piper Aircraft v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am
On June 19, 1995 the United States Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hurley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Cessna and Piper v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:43 am
See Slip op. at 7136 (citing Sinochem Int'l Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
Allegations of deceit or an intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (CPLR § 3016 [b]; Facebookv DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
U.S. v. $405,089.23 In United States Currency, et al. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
WHAT: Major Forum on upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments in State of Arizona v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:29 am
Savitt v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
As to a claim under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), “[a]llegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
DLA Piper provides a summary here. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Smiths Medical, 165 P.3d 433, 436 n.5 (Wyo. 2007).Jurisdictions In Which Intermediate Appellate Courts Have Applied the Rule in Prescription Medical Device Cases (9):Arizona: Piper v. [read post]
