Search for: "State v. Piper"
Results 101 - 120
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2018, 4:40 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
There was a comment on the DLA Piper “Privacy Matters” blog. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
DLA Piper has produced a summary and analysis of the decision. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘Allegations regarding an act of deceit . . . must be stated with particularity'” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
Gillig, 602 F.3d at 1363; In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 244 F.3d 1289, 1298 (11th Cir. 2001); Curtis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
In today’s case (Kam v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:09 am
[3] Piper Aircraft v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am
On June 19, 1995 the United States Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hurley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Cessna and Piper v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:43 am
See Slip op. at 7136 (citing Sinochem Int'l Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
Allegations of deceit or an intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (CPLR § 3016 [b]; Facebookv DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
U.S. v. $405,089.23 In United States Currency, et al. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
WHAT: Major Forum on upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments in State of Arizona v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:29 am
Savitt v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
As to a claim under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), “[a]llegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
DLA Piper provides a summary here. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Smiths Medical, 165 P.3d 433, 436 n.5 (Wyo. 2007).Jurisdictions In Which Intermediate Appellate Courts Have Applied the Rule in Prescription Medical Device Cases (9):Arizona: Piper v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 4:11 pm
DLA Piper has more information here. [read post]
