Search for: "State v. Sides"
Results 101 - 120
of 26,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:39 am
La Rosa v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am
It had eight depots spread throughout the State. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
Can Tennessee figure out how to keep another state’s atmosphere on its side of the border, or how to get around the Supremacy Clause? [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:12 pm
The 2018 Supreme Court case Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:47 am
In Pulsifer v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Two years later, the California Supreme Court sided with peyote users who asserted that a state law prohibiting the use of peyote interfered with their right to freely exercise their religion. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
P’ship v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm
The en banc high court partially reversed a Court of Chancery decision that the derivative suit must be dismissed because IAC met the requirements of independence set by the milestone opinion in Kahn v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
If a government official identifies themselves as such on their account, but lacks the authority to act on behalf of the state, there is no state action. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]