Search for: "Still v. Lance" Results 101 - 120 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am by David Kopel
Even with sales or manufacture bans included, this Article would still be very short. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
And although this fact isn’t dispositive, the city still has an en banc petition pending in the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
S ome of these we’re still fighting, but with the preemption threat to warning claims removed, most of these have receded into the background.We saw – and see – it a fourth time in PMA medical devices, especially after Riegel v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
For much of the oral argument in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:14 am
She rushed back to the window, still holding her baby, and stared down at the street. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Bexis
 Still, that’s in the future – hopefully in a top ten list yet to come. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
The UK litigation which led to the CJEU ruling in Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd and Starion International Ltd [on which see Katnote here] might be said to be an example of an attempt to change the law succeeding; the assault on Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV and others [2007] EWCA Civ 364 in Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:17 am by Brad Schnure
When their proposal was challenged, the New Jersey Supreme Court reaffirmed in Lance v. [read post]