Search for: "Strong v Thomas"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Or California v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Is there a strong textual basis for the majority opinion? [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Because even if I lived in Santa Clara county (which I don't), I'd have to admit during voir dire that I have already come to a tentative -- but fairly strong -- opinion that at least certain people in the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office are totally and completely corrupt, and should be in prison.The defendant here is Apple's head of global security, Thomas Moyer. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
From today's California Court of Appeal opinion in Iloh v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
at 4; the MQD is a “strong” clear statement rule, id. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” It did so by overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
He also "has expressed a very strong tendency to protect the prerogatives of the judiciary," as in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
If you want a wonderful summary of the inanity of Thomas' opinion, here's a piece for you.In Biden v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
Audemars Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
In a statement, US President Biden said he welcomed the adequacy decision, noting it reflects the US and EU’s “joint commitment to strong data privacy protections and will create greater economic opportunities for our countries and companies on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
But it's worth noting that scholars and legal commentators such as Indiana University law professor Gerard Magliocca and my Cato Institute colleague Thomas Berry have put forward strong arguments that legacy preferences at public institutions are banned by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
(Just like Justice Thomas never thought much about Roe before his confirmation!) [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
The "strong" version of the Independent State Legislature Doctrine was never going to be approved. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]
