Search for: "T. L. S. v. State of Alabama " Results 101 - 120 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 6:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(As it happens, defendant L’Oreal’s distribution contracts state that diversion damages L’Oreal’s goodwill with consumers and provide for liquidated damages of $100 per unit a salon diverts.)As the court explained, “[t]he primary reason that this motion to certify a class fails is the unresolved tension between the legal claims brought by the plaintiffs and their theory of damages. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Alabamas doctrine is somewhat distinct, in that it seems to combine a tough alternative design requirement with a consumer expectation test. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Hasen recounts (p. 23), the Supreme Court shamefully refused to intervene in Alabamas blatantly racist denial of voting rights in Giles v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Even federal judges, many of whom arrive steeped in the system of state common law, are not immune to this reaction.We don't think that's right, but we're realists enough to know that it happens. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:56 am by jonathanturley
The court’s other citation is to a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Jane L. v. [read post]