Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 101 - 120
of 304,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 9:55 pm
Nous avons pu voir à quoi ressemble ce réseau social et à première vue il paraît plutôt stable pour une version de ce type. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The point of dispute rather is whether or not R 87 EPC 1973 is a Rule implementing A 54(4) EPC 1973 and consequently could be applied, or whether the situation is covered by A 123 and R 138 EPC. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 8:17 am
He's not wondering why he can't eat his waffle. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Accordingly, the statement of grounds includes a section entitled “Correction of obvious errors (R 139)”. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 4:47 pm
& T. permit tethering, and have a 5 Gigabyte a month limit on data, T-Mobile has seen fit to cap data at 1 Gigabyte a month. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
However, decision J 27/96 is concerned with R 88 EPC 1973 (R 139 EPC 2000), which applies to corrections of errors in documents filed before the EPO, whereas the [opponent] is objecting to a decision concerning a correction under R 140 EPC 2000 (R 89 EPC 1973), which applies to decisions of deciding bodies of the EPO. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:00 am
” Any purported “awareness” of his misconduct constituted nothing more than “constructive knowledge,” which was not actionable – particularly in the absence of any “duty” to protect the plaintiff or her interests.They certainly didn’t aid or abet that ….# # #DECISIONG. v R. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
There are lots of reasons why you don’t want to be treated for hypogonadism if you don’t actually have it. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:25 pm
DS doesn't really buy this. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Sonja Schmidt on Senator Barbara Boxer. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
The requested “correction” has already been carried out in claim 1 according to the main request and the auxiliary requests 1 to 3 and 5.[2.1] However, neither R 139 nor R 140 allow for a “correction” of the granted patent as desired by the [patent proprietor] (see G 1/10 [order, as well as point 1 and points 10 and 11 of the reasons in connection with point VII.2 of the summary of facts and submissions]. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:59 pm
R. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
A kind colleague has informed me that Board 3.3.01 has now issued its final decision in case T 584/09.In this case the opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent in amended form.In its first decision, dated February 3, 2011, Board 3.3.01 revoked the patent.The Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA), in its decision R 21/11, set aside the decision because the deciding Board had not been aware of a request (to admit expert opinion D27) and, therefore,… [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In particular, in T 1855/07 [2], referring to existing jurisprudence (see T 367/96; T 301/87; T 472/88; T 362/02 (NB: this should read T 326/02); T 381/02), the board held that the power to examine clarity under A 84 failed when the amendment merely consisted in the literal inclusion of dependent claims into the associated independent claim of a patent as granted (“satzbauliche Eingliederung”). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:51 pm
Looking at Who Should Be Using Low T Drugs There are two kinds of people taking low T drugs. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
Per the WSJ, the AD sued to enjoin the deal for AT&T to acquire T-Mobile. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:08 am
La souscription effectuée au capital d’une société holding est éligible à la réduction d’impôt sur le revenu prévue par l’article 199 terdecies-O A du code général des impôts lorsque cette société souscrit au capital d’une société holding animatrice qui est considérée comme exerçant une… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:26 pm
And it won't be pretty! [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:59 am
Une première condition idéale, dans laquelle les termes "seulement" et "uniquement" peuvent revêtir leur signification plutôt exclusive, s'applique dans le cadre de l'invention définie par la revendication avec un certain niveau d'abstraction, et donc de théorie. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
There is an interesting final remark on the composition of the Examining Division (ED).[3] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal that for a decision to be reasoned it must contain a logical sequence of arguments and that all facts, evidence and arguments essential to the decision must be discussed in detail (see for instance T 278/00 [2-4]; T 1997/08 [4]).[4] The Boards of Appeal have consistently decided further that a request for a decision based on the current… [read post]
