Search for: "TAKE v. POWELL"
Results 101 - 120
of 890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Today’s decision in Powell goes some way towards resolving that quandary. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
INTA 2023 International Roundtable: Trademark Prosecution and Enforcement in the UK after Sky v Skykick - 6 July at 9:30AMOn July 6th, INTA organises a roundtable on the topic of trademark prosecution and enforcement in the UK after Sky v Skykick, which will take place at the London offices of Pinsent Masons LLP in order to discuss on which way the Supreme Court should rule on the same case and why, and to consider the practical implications of each… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:03 am
From Weidman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 The Supreme Court has finally decided on the issue that has been hanging over private sector possession claims since Pinnock and Powell – whether article 8 proportionality of eviction defence might also apply to the private sector as well as to public body landlords. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
In this week’s case (Racy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Wilner (retired, specially assigned).From the official headnote:Reaffirming the Yorkdale Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
Powell et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:35 am
Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 498, 96 S. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:45 pm
There is a major problem with these laws: they violate the Constitution.As the Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
On renewed permission to appeal, Arden LJ accepted that arguably this should be treated as a first appeal, the DJ having reached a decision before the relevant judgments in Pinnock and Powell, so that the CJ’s decision was the first on proportionality.Mr H submitted that this case was analogous to that of Powell in Powell v Hounslow. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
On renewed permission to appeal, Arden LJ accepted that arguably this should be treated as a first appeal, the DJ having reached a decision before the relevant judgments in Pinnock and Powell, so that the CJ’s decision was the first on proportionality.Mr H submitted that this case was analogous to that of Powell in Powell v Hounslow. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
More specifically, those taking this positon cite Richard Nixon, not Harry Blackmun in writing Roe, as the villain. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
Powell, 469 U.S. 57 (1984), and Dunn v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:54 am
Sherry Colb (Cornell) at Dorf on Law, discussing the "Court Should Start with a Presumption That Art Is Art, Not a Statement of Fact" (Bey-Cousin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
So even if Field v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:40 pm
Anyway, conventional wisdom will soon coalesce around the proposition that Roland Burris is doing himself a disservice by accepting the Senate appointment, but, as numerous news stories have already pointed out, Powell v. [read post]
