Search for: "TAYLOR v. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY" Results 101 - 120 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Background After graduating with honors from Harvard University and Harvard Law School, D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Hayden Center for Intelligence, Policy and International Security at George Mason University covering the historical challenges of constructing the president’s daily intelligence brief. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
American Red Cross Blood Services, 745 N.E.2d 462, 465 (Ohio App. 2000) (“following the regulations, dictated by the FDA” could not constitute “outrageous” conduct); Haughton v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
”[1]   Kristen Ranges recently earned her law degree from the University of Miami School of Law, and her doctorate in Environmental Science and Policy, from the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am by Marcia Coyle
The Supreme Court created the doctrine of qualified immunity in a 1967 decision in the case Pierson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm by Steve Hall
"There are significant unintended consequences of this bill that are already being litigated," said David Aaronson, a law professor at American University. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
" Witnesses testifying included representatives from: Ohio Coal Association; Industrial Energy Consumers of America; James River Air Conditioning Company, Inc.; Charles River Associates; Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance at Stanford University; Gina McCarthy, U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]