Search for: "Taylor v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
It seems that under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was “adversely affected” by his “intoxication on the job” during the next six months. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:54 am
The Appellate Division decided that Taylor's dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
The Court stated that as described in Conolly v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
Superior Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 147; Taylor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:13 pm
” The Superior Court, set aside the commission’s findings, enjoined development of the property without prior approval of the court. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am
In 2003, a California Appellate Court held that, even if the plaintiff cannot recover damages from the Navy, the Navy is an entity to whom the jury can allocate “fault” (Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DILLON, J.P., MALTESE, TAYLOR and LANDICINO, JJ., concur. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DILLON, J.P., MALTESE, TAYLOR and LANDICINO, JJ., concur. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.In contrast, in Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
Nick Taylor (NFP) - "Nick Taylor ("Taylor") filed a complaint in Marion Superior Court against Theatre on the Square ("the Theatre"). [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
I have sometimes written my opposition to unpublished opinions.The Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in Hughes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
"NYPPL comment: The classic case addressing this type of distinction is Taylor v Cass, 505 N.Y.S.2d 929.Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after the court found that he was improperly dismissed while serving a disciplinary probation.Under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 10:20 am
In Washington v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
Under the terms of the disciplinary settlement Taylor was subject to termination without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by his consumption of alcohol. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 11:06 am
Another County Court decision does little to advance the cause of action in Australian law, and it obviously remains to be seen if there will be an appeal in this matter such that a superior court will have the opportunity to consider the development of the tort. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:17 am
Superior Court of Santa Clara County case. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Accordingly, the order of the Superior Court was reversed, and the trial court’s orders were reinstated.Read More: PA Supreme Court denies prisoner’s right to expungeCounty of Grant v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:57 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
