Search for: "Teague v. Teague"
Results 101 - 120
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Intricate discussions of retroactivity doctrine and federalism, habeas corpus, and finality, have proven attractive to some of the Justices in the past in cases such as Teague v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm
On the retroactivity question, the Justices will be dealing with the continuing legal fall-out of a decision they issued in 1989, Teague v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 2:19 pm
The main argument of the brief is that the "first exception" to the anti-retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
§2254(d) if the California Supreme Court is deemed to have ruled on the question and under the rule of Teague v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:39 pm
Fundación Vía Libre, organización no gubernamental argentina que desde el año 2000 promueve el uso del software libre, el derecho a la privacidad y la defensa de los derechos digitales, ha advertido con antelación sobre los riesgos de la adopción de un sistema vulnerable. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
An official from New South Wales' Electoral Commission attempted to discredit Halderman and Teague's work as a part of biased campaign against all e-voting, but finally conceded the risk and modified their systems to address their concerns. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Walker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Some academics and defense lawyers tried to claim that the new limit was either a codification of Teague v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
McCleod v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
West $3.1 Million Jury Verdict for Death of Patient Following Heart Procedure; Estate of Teague v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
P. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am
The majority further went on to hold that it was not creating a "new rule" within the meaning of Teague v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
In Teague v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court has held that the Ring ruling is not retroactive as to those cases already final on direct appeal when Ring was decided, i.e., does not apply to cases on collateral attack under the non-retroactivity doctrine per Teague v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Estate of Ivory Lakes v. [read post]
