Search for: "Test Electrical Services, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
Fedex Office & Print Servs., Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:53 am
" Applicant argued that the first cited mark is used for a billiard blog rather than for the services identified in the registration, and as to the second mark there was no evidence that the mark is being used at all.]In re Bayco Products, Inc., Serial No. 87708217 (December 17, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:36 pm
Diverse Power, a company that provides electrical power that competes with LaGrange’s natural gas service, suffered competitive harm from this ordinance that tied water service to installation of gas (as opposed to electric) appliances. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 11:55 am
Second, AB 5 exempts several categories of professions, referral services, and vendors from the ABC test –if they meet a series of criteria. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am
Gadabout Tours, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:01 am
" Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
Last year, the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
November 7, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Gigit, Inc., Serial No. 87069673 [Refusal to register GIGIT for "staff augmentation services, namely, providing information technology (IT) support staff; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases" and for "computer and information technology security services, namely, providing social engineering assessments and assessing and testing the security posture and vulnerability of computer networks and the… [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
NantKwest, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
Hronis, Inc., a Delano, California company was the producer. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
- the tricky issue of priority right transfer (T 0725/14) | Everything is awesome: Lego blocks “Lepin” trade mark registration | AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that copyright protection in designs simply arises when they are original | Fordham 27 (Report 14): Priority | Fordham 27 (Report 13): PTAB | “AGING BACKWARDS” for fitness-related goods and services? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:01 am
If you have been unable to pay your utility bill, companies may threaten to disconnect crucial resources such as water, electricity, and gas. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
General Electric Company, et al. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
And in Canada, a Chinese takeover of a major contractor faces a national security test. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
