Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Stevens" Results 101 - 120 of 2,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
The impact of climate change on the cultural identity of Indigenous Peoples and the nation’s first “climate refugees”. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
”   The phrase “original public meaning” seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson  with Steven Calabresi as another “early adopter. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Gleanings from the newly opened Stevens papers: Chief Justice Rehnquist and the ISL theory in Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
I don't think anything in the Stevens papers is likely to persuade many people to change their minds about the case. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am by Ilya Somin
      The post What I Hope to Learn from Justice Stevens' Papers on Kelo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  To take one example: many people have tried to explain to me how holding companies work, but Mark, at page 970, is the only person who has succeeded. [read post]