Search for: "Thomas v. Given" Results 101 - 120 of 5,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2022, 9:53 am by Giles Peaker
O G Thomas Amaethyddiaeth CYF & Anor v Turner & Ors (2022) EWCA Civ 1446 In which the Court of Appeal considers whether a notice to quit that named the wrong tenant was valid. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:26 am by Mark Tushnet
I finally got around to reading Graham v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:52 am by admin
Given that Breyer and Thomas each file dissents, one might expect a colorful opinion. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
The Internet is abuzz about Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
But the dissent makes a strong case that $350 limits are unconstitutionally low, given Randall v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 6:35 am by Eric Guttag
By holding that Myriad’s claimed cDNA was patent-eligible, Thomas’ opinion reaffirms the major holding in Diamond v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:09 pm
When I first saw the caption to this case -- Capra v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am by Jeff Redding
’  I say this only to emphasize that I am not particularly invested in the outcome of the ‘2 v. 3’ debate. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The hearing officer recommended Thomas be terminated from his employment "given the nature of the incidents, [Thomas'] lack of credibility and lack of remorse, and his previous disciplinary suspension of five days for harassing a co-worker and improper performance of his duties, as well as previous reprimands. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The hearing officer recommended Thomas be terminated from his employment "given the nature of the incidents, [Thomas'] lack of credibility and lack of remorse, and his previous disciplinary suspension of five days for harassing a co-worker and improper performance of his duties, as well as previous reprimands. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:27 am by Anna Salvatore
Justice Clarence Thomas released a statement agreeing with the court's decision to not hear the Section 230 case, known as MalwareBytes Inc. v. [read post]