Search for: "Thomas v. Marshall" Results 101 - 120 of 899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
 Writing for the Court’s majority, Chief Justice John Marshall, an influential Federalist advocate, stated that the Bill of Rights amendments “contain no expression indicating an intention to apply them to the State governments. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Thomas Law Review 18 (2022): 510-524. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Marshall and Thomas had mustaches. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
But to date only Justice Thomas has indicated an interest in revisiting the Court’s immunity decisions. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Vermeule, however, writes in a cultural moment where there is far less trust in, or even respect for, the federal judiciary, coupled with ever-increasing doubt that existing approaches to “constitutional interpretation” are adequate to the responding to what John Marshall called in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am by Michael Ehline
Following this, he attended Oxford as a Marshall scholar, after which he would take on Harvard Law School. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am by Radhika Rao
She clerked for Justices Harry Blackmun and Thurgood Marshall in the 1992-93 term. [read post]