Search for: "Thomas v. Shaw" Results 101 - 120 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm by Adam Schlossman
Commission on Civil Rights and present professor at the University of San Diego Law School Podcast: with David Stras, law professor at the University of Minnesota, on his experience clerking for Justice Clarence Thomas “What Powell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media and related cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers Limited, heard 25 and 26 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls and Moore-Bick and Moses LJJ) Ambrosiadou v Coward, heard 21 and 22 June 2010 (Eady J) Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward,… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Brooklyn Brew Shop, LLC, 2020 USPQ2d 460354 (TTAB 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
Freud America, Inc., 2019 USPQ2d 460354 (TTAB 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am by Richard Hasen
It calls into mind Daniel Lowenstein’s critique of the predominant factor test from Shaw v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Playwright George Bernard Shaw was not stretching the truth when he gave one of his characters these words: “Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113 - ADASee issue description at Public Citizeno SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has an article by lawyer JJ Shaw examining the potential legal and ethical implications of using AI in the newsroom. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the elevation of Judge Thomas M. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
 In re Post Foods, LLC, 2024 USPQ2d 25 (TTAB 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]