Search for: "Turner v. Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Sarah Deer, Professor, University of KansasKathleen Littleleaf, Billings Urban Indian Health & Wellness CenterSession Moderators: Robin Turner (ILS Section Member) & Lillian AlvernazSession Overview: This panel will discuss the impacts of over-policing and incarceration of Native American people and how Tribal justice systems can work to holistically support individuals involved in the criminal justice system. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Turner has attempted to obtain information relating to the decision – without much success. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:24 pm by Alfred Brophy
 And pretty closely related to Thomas Ruffin's State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
“, Griffin Law “High Court provides guidance on “serious harm” requirement under Defamation Act 2013 and on procedural management of defamation claims“, Neil Blake and Thomas Turner, Herbert Smith Freehills – Litigation Notes “Bar Raised for Libel Claimants“, Jo Vale, Hold the Front Page. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode)   Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode)   Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Bedessee Imports Ltd. v. [read post]