Search for: "U. S. v. Kelly" Results 101 - 120 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
Yet, if courts follow the logic that underlies the Supreme Court’s decision in Opitz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
Kelly, é uma das músicas mais chiclete ever. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
Kelly, é uma das músicas mais chiclete ever. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 3 November 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Kelly v Hilton [No 2] [2022] WASC 374, in [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Canada On 12 November, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta handed down judgement in RK v GSG, 2024 ABKB 661. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
”  In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]