Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers"
Results 101 - 120
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
A settlement order, reached as part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to stamp out online marketing fraud, permanently bans Jesse Willms and his companies from using ‘negative-option’ marketing, a practice in which the seller interprets consumers’ silence or inaction as permission to charge them. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:25 am
[U]nlike typical restrictive covenants, upon which a prospective employee's position may depend, there were no consequences attached to [the employee]'s refusal to accept the agreement. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
Anderson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The 2002 decision in Random House v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The 2002 decision in Random House v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:48 am
Cigar Ass’n of Am. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
Good, in which the U. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 2:47 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 2:47 am
In People v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
” The Restatement’s articulated standard does not call for the seller’s subjective awareness as a necessary condition. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
Justice Roberts cited the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
Justice Roberts cited the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Gorelick, General Counsel, U. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:48 am
AmClyde, 511 U. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The case of Epic Games v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
Phelps, 562 U. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
Chiu v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
Andreas, 463 U. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
[J&J], a manufacturer and seller of cosmetic talc. [read post]
