Search for: "U. S. v. Williams" Results 101 - 120 of 756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2025, 5:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
HOF I Grantor Trust 5 v YLW Squared Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 30681(U) February 26, 2025 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 531361/22 Judge: Lawrence Knipel is a mess. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by William Baude, guest-blogging
Capato (thanks, Nick, for calling it to my attention), and the habeas case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm by Kevin Maillard
Contributors include:Matt Fletcher (MSU)Carla Pratt (Penn State)  Rose Cuison Villazor (Hofstra)Kevin Noble Maillard (Syracuse)Joanne Barker (SF State)Cara Watt-Cowan (Cherokee Nation)Heather WIlliams (Cherokee Nation)Tiya Miles (U Michigan) ----Graphic: my great-great-grandfather, Jimmy Carter, c. 1885, Wewoka, OK [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
In DISMISSING plaintiffs' appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, held: To the extent the court denied plaintiffs' oral motion, no appeal as of right lies from an order which does not decide a motion made on notice, and the instant motion, although not ex parte, was not made on notice (see CCA 1702 [a] [2]; CPLR 2211; 1223 Bushwick, LLC v Williams, 19 Misc 3d 128[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 50512[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; Cucaj v… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Siracusa v Sager   2011 NY Slip Op 32244(U);August 3, 2011;Supreme Court, Suffolk County; Docket Number: 06-35942; gives Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan the opportunity to review a many faceted matrimonial child support legal malpractice case. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am by fjhinojosa
Ragosta, A Wall Between Secular Government and a Religious People, 26 Roger Williams U. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Englese v Sladkus  2018 NY Slip Op 50625(U) Decided on April 25, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County St. [read post]
Correctional Admin., 892 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2018) (“materially changes” employment conditions in a manner “more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities”); Williams v. [read post]