Search for: "U.S. v. Barker"
Results 101 - 120
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2014, 10:25 am
Supreme Court in 1972 in Barker v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm
Velazquez pleaded guilty conditionally, reserving his right to appeal the speedy trial issue, and was sentenced to 80 months in prison followed by five years of supervised release.On appeal, the Third Circuit applied the test from Barker v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:45 am
See Barker, 407 U.S. at 531; Cantu v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
” inKit Barker and Darryn Jensen eds., Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013). [6] Marek v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:14 am
Baby Girl — Jack Trope The U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm
A U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:32 am
Finally, Commissioner Barker opined that the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in EEOC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
A previous lawsuit, Vehicle Service Group, LLC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:36 am
Accordingly, the court denied summary judgment to the school board on the 56-year-old teacher’s age discrimination claim (Barker v Ellington Board of Education, December 5, 2013, Hall, J). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Meltwater U.S. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Barker v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
Read on for a recap of the TPIR lawsuit . . .Brandi Cochran v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm
One of the most famous is Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:25 pm
Yesterday, the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:14 am
The U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his… [read post]
