Search for: "U.S. v. Burrows" Results 101 - 113 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Huang, Empirical Analysis of Australian Trademark Infringement Decisions: Implications for the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
SAP had not contested liability, so all was remaining was for the jury award on damages, which is reported to be the highest copyright infringement award ever in the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
Section 306 of The Copyright Act protects “original works of authorship,” which implies a human hand in the process.[22] The Act makes the human requirement clear: “The U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
Section 306 of The Copyright Act protects “original works of authorship,” which implies a human hand in the process.[22] The Act makes the human requirement clear: “The U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney) Plaintiffs v. [read post]